Jump to content

Mich-91

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mich-91

  1. 1. Do you think if i am willing to modify my case (top trays direct on case), and fit the 4x480 (45mm) + would be a better cooling than the one you mentioned? sacrificing some thickness for more vertical space and more fans in push-pull. This one 100% works and fits. No the 2 x 480 and 2 x 360 Rads, all at 60mm thickness and all in push/pull, have a greater cooling capacity than 480 - 45mm rads. 2. With this modification maybe i could even fit 2x480 (55/58mm) on top + 2x480 (45mm) on front or vice-versa, that one would surely outperform in terms of cooling but i'm not even sure if that's possible and would fit. I don't think this combination in No 2 would even fit in push/pull, no matter how much you modified the case. Plus the 2 x 360 - 60mm rads would have a greater cooling capacity than the 2 x 480 - 45mm rads. Honestly the best way to go is the 2 x 480 and 2 x 360 Rads, at 60mm and all in push/pull and you don't need to modify a single thing to make them fit.. And especially with you wanting to run 4 x 3090 GPU's, the thicker rads will most definitely give you the maximum/lowest temps, especially when your system is under load.
  2. For max cooling performance in the 1000d, you would need to have 2 x 480 (58/60mm) radiators at the front and 2 x 360 (58/60 mm) radiators at the top, all in push/pull. The above combination gives the best radiator cooling, as well as the most silent fan operation, and all fits inside the case, without having to modify any of the rails.. It would look the same as the first pic in your post, which is the one Corsair built. Using radiators that are thinner then the above ones, will result in less cooling performance. 60mm radiators in push/pull give the best cooling performance, over 30mm or 45mm radiators., With all the hardware you are putting into the case, especially the 4 x 3090 GPU's, you will need the thicker 60mm to achieve the best temps.
  3. Would like to please know when this product will actually be available, as in actually in stock and can be purchased ? Thank you.
  4. Doesn't your 1000d have the top fans as exhaust ? The pic I saw of it shows the top fans as exhaust. So if having the top as intake is a better way, then why are your top fans set for exhaust ? Just wanting to know which is truly the best way to setup air flow, top and front intake or top exhaust as heat rises and front intake ?
  5. Hi, I am about to build a new system in a Corsair 1000D using all EKWB watercooling components and fans. I will be running 4 radiators - 2 x EKWB XE 480 radiators in push/pull at the front, 2 x EKWB XE 360 radiators in push pull at the top. I am using EKWB EVO Vardar 120ER D-RGB fans. In total I will have 32 fans, 28 on the radiators and 4 on the case - 2 on the top and 2 on the rear. I have all the PWM side of the things sorted, as I will be using multiple EKWB 4 Way PWM Powered Splitter cables to connect up all the fans power back to the board. My question is for the D-RGB side of the fans, for getting them connected up and running off the 2 x D-RGB headers on the board. I am using a ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero Board. My plan is to connect them all up using multiple EKWB 6-Way D-RGB Splitter cables. However for all the fans, the total rgb load exceeds the 3AMP limit of the header on the board. So I was looking at using the following Silverstone 8 x D-RGB Powered Hub below, as it increases the total load to 9AMP - 4.5 AMP per channel and then connecting the multiple EKWB 6 Way D-RGB Splitters to each channel on the hub. Then the hub connects to one header on the board, SIlverstone D-RGB Hub - SilverStone CPL02-E INTRODUCTION (silverstonetek.com) Just wanted to get opinions for people that have built with that many D-RGB fans and see if that is a workable solution, without having to buy Corsair Commander Pro's and Lightning Nodes, since my fans are not Corsair fans. Look forward to your replies. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...