agontijo Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 Hi Ramguy and everybody, I got totally dissappointed with my TwinX 1024 3200C2 kit, which is a CAS 2.5 memory and not C2. Even getting a great score, the memory only works on 2.5, so I'm feeling cheated. So I got a brand new 3200LL to try to achieve the CAS 2 rate. And after trying a lot of combinations on my mobo, I still can't get it working fast without erros on memtest. I tried in every possible combinations: - SPD - 2-2-6-3 - 2-3-6-3 - 2-3-8-3 - 2.5-3-8-3 with 2.7, 2.8 and even 2.9 volts, using the FAST and TURBO configurations. I was using the 1.9 BIOS, and downgraded to 1.3, but the same results. The only error-free configuration is running on SLOW mode, but this gives me just a poor result. Does anyone knows the cause of it?! The 3200LL isn't the best kit for the top performance with this mobo? Why it only works right with the SLOW mode? Regards, AleX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ferry_g Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Since you're using C2, set your Dram as follow: DRAM CAS# Latency [2.0 clocks] DRAM RAS# Precharge [3 clocks] DRAM RAS# to CAS# delay [3 clocks] DRAM Precharge Delay [6 clocks] Good Luck, Ferry. [COLOR=navy][SIZE=1]*Asus P4C800 Deluxe rev. 1.03 Bios 1014*iP4 2.8c SL6Z5 0108@FSB 250 1,6v stock fan*FSB/DDR : 5/4*Corsair TwinX1024 3200LLPRO(v1.0 0342002) CAS 2-3-2-6 2,55v*2x ST3120026AS Raid2+0 Stripe*Gygabyte GeForce FX 5900 XT 128 mb@(400/700) - ForceWare 53.03*Asus dvd/cdrw*Thermaltake 480w PFC*HEC 6A19 case*AGP v: 1,5v*AGP Aperture Size: 64M*Legacy USB: disable*Performance Mode: Standard*PAT:Auto*note: Prime95 v23.7 failed*PCMark04: 5,225*3DMark03 b340: 5,481[/COLOR][/SIZE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerKomtur Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 lo dudes , i am running a msi 865neo2-fisr and corsair twinx1024 3200ll with C2:RC3:R2:CT5 at 160 mhz at 5:4 i installed bios 2.0 no errors so far ram guy: this setting is better then 2:3:3:6 right ? thx for reply DerKomtur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsair Employee RAM GUY Posted February 27, 2004 Corsair Employee Share Posted February 27, 2004 You should be able to run our LL modules ate Cass 2-3-2-6 and that would be a bit faster than Cass 2-3-3-6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agontijo Posted February 27, 2004 Author Share Posted February 27, 2004 Hi Ferry, You should look here, [url]http://www.houseofhelp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22728[/url], the problem is solved althought the memory really don't get CAS2. I'm getting FSB 200 MHz (Auto), 2.5-3-2-5, with Turbo and 2.6V, thanks to the new Bios 2.0. Regards, AleX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.