jeroompje Posted April 30, 2013 Share Posted April 30, 2013 Today i got a new personal record benchmarking my raid-0 configuration built with 4x Force GT 120Gb, each connected to intel sata-2 controller. http://s20.postimg.org/h4sis2ljx/30_04_2013_4x_GT_raid0_as.jpg cheers, Jerome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsair Employee RAM GUY Posted April 30, 2013 Corsair Employee Share Posted April 30, 2013 Run ATTO and post a screen shot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Run ATTO and post a screen shot! your wish... http://s20.postimg.org/ghc5mbt0d/30_04_2013_4x_GT_raid0_atto.jpg got a changelog already for 5.05a ? cheers, Jerome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canthearu Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Nice work. Can't wait for Haswell motherboards ... we will see some nice figures with those! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Nice work. Can't wait for Haswell motherboards ... we will see some nice figures with those! me too; with Haswell you've got 6x Intel sata-3 (should double the scores) cheers, Jerome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nec_V20 Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Here are my results for my drive, do I win a prize? I know the results could be better but I enabled compression on the drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Here are my results for my drive, do I win a prize? I know the results could be better but I enabled compression on the drive. i guess you are using a discrete pcie raid controller. if so, disable the cache and test again :) also, my ssd's are connected to the intel sata-2 ports.. (before we start comparing apples with pears) cheers, Jerome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandey Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Dude you really need to get those hooked up to SATA III, I would imagine your results would show improvement here is mine 2xForce 3 GT 120's. As you can see my two drives seems to be a bit faster together. http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/5236/raid0e.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nec_V20 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 jeroompje, no, that was the result from my RAM Disk, but I just couldn't resist. :laughing: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 Dude you really need to get those hooked up to SATA III, I would imagine your results would show improvement here is mine 2xForce 3 GT 120's. As you can see my two drives seems to be a bit faster together. i need the space, that's why i created an array of 4. and with Z68, i'v got only 2 intel sata-3 ports. your writes are behind mine; that's the weakest spot of the Force GT with their sandforce controller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 jeroompje, no, that was the result from my RAM Disk, but I just couldn't resist. :laughing: i knew there was something :laughing: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..AlLkNoWinG.. Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Here is my AS SSD results with Neutron GTX 240GB Raid 0 on Z77 chispet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 4, 2013 Author Share Posted May 4, 2013 Here is my AS SSD results with Neutron GTX 240GB Raid 0 on Z77 chispet! fourth generation ssd's.. of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmanico Posted May 5, 2013 Share Posted May 5, 2013 What settings re you guys using as far as stripe size and what not when setting up your raid. Seems in Atto up till I hit the 64.0 mark, I'im getting slower than average speeds, then above that I'm getting speeds that are about on the nose where i should be using 2 90 GB Force GT in Raid0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 5, 2013 Author Share Posted May 5, 2013 What settings re you guys using as far as stripe size and what not when setting up your raid. Seems in Atto up till I hit the 64.0 mark, I'im getting slower than average speeds, then above that I'm getting speeds that are about on the nose where i should be using 2 90 GB Force GT in Raid0. i get the best results and best "feeling" with 64Kb stripesize Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmanico Posted May 5, 2013 Share Posted May 5, 2013 Ill have to check mine See what it's set at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..AlLkNoWinG.. Posted May 6, 2013 Share Posted May 6, 2013 128k recommended for LAMD Neutron GTX or 64k for Froce GS. I will be conducting a large test to evaluate the best combination on the two. I will post a thread once I finish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroompje Posted May 11, 2013 Author Share Posted May 11, 2013 even got better scores after uninstalling irst tool! check http://www.win-raid.com/ http://s20.postimg.org/627en2n4t/11_05_2013_4x_GT_raid0_as.jpg cheers, Jerome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incriminated Posted May 11, 2013 Share Posted May 11, 2013 Great idea to measure a RAM-DIsk in ATTO additionally to SSD-speed, because when RAM is to slow, this covers up bottlenecks. The SSD can only write/read as fast as the CPU is able to read and write data from and into to RAM. To be honest this is just a briefly consideration, the RAM-disk filesystem or software may be slower than the RAMs real performance, while minor abbreveation makes it look like SSD is partly faster than ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.