Jump to content
Corsair Community

Force 3 240GB Performance -- SATA2 -- HELP!


cog

Recommended Posts

Ok, so I'm at my wits end here. My system is a brand new shiny Lenovo Thinkpad W520, complete with SATA3/6.0GB/s. I've tried every combination under the sun (SSD in main bay, in Ultra Bay, External eSATA) and I can't seem to crack the speed benchmarks of all the reviews that are showing ~500GB/s. I'm wallowing in this 200GB/s mess.

 

I've tried using both the Intel RST drivers as well as the base Windows drivers with little to no speed difference. I have ACHI turned on in the BIOS as well.

 

I've also tried installing from a stock Windows 7 ISO, adding the RST drivers during the install, and all benchmarks remain locked at about these speeds.

 

Does *anyone* have any thoughts here? I'm sick that I've just forked out nearly $500 for a sata3 SSD and am getting sata2 speeds...

 

Am about ready to punt the laptop and the drive and just go buy an AlienWare m18x and call it a day.

 

CrystalDiskInfo:

attachment.php?attachmentid=8941&stc=1&d=1312793269

 

CrystalDiskMark:

attachment.php?attachmentid=8939&d=1312705305

 

ATTO:

attachment.php?attachmentid=8940&d=1312705309

CDM_200.sata2speeds.png.9a04ff093283df27a90ed9a74f42622b.png

ATTO_260.sata2speeds.png.a8d437792c1ebece8d65e3e18d35a05a.png

CDI.nforce3.sata6.1_3fw.thumb.png.be320981cf64c9fa8e7c75d4f4c3db4e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally, the SSD Drive has been upgraded to the 1.3 firmware.

 

My current build is based on this absolutely wonderful walk-through put together by Matthew Ammann.

 

ThinkPads and SSDs Part 1: Preparation

 

ThinkPads and SSDs Part 2: Hard Drive Swapping and Windows 7 Installation

 

ThinkPads and SSDs Part 3: Windows 7 Configuration and SSD tweaks

 

Further details with this approach is that I used the USB installation method and have applied the SSD tweaks and turned off the defrag schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BIOS Version: 1.26 (just upgraded)

 

New benchmarks after BIOS upgrade... (slightly better, 0-fill)

attachment.php?attachmentid=8944&d=1312713032

 

While I hadn't experienced any sort of lock-ups, I went ahead and disabled Link Power Management through this guide.

 

New benchmarks after LPM disable... (slightly better, 0-fill)

attachment.php?attachmentid=8945&d=1312713042

 

Here's more details around the system/motherboard...

attachment.php?attachmentid=8946&d=1312713048

 

And details around the adapter...

attachment.php?attachmentid=8947&d=1312713052

 

While I understand that this REV4 of the adapter has some issues on ports 2+, ports 0 and 1 should be at full speed.

CDM_200.sata2speeds.500mb.0fill.1.26BIOS.png.116d2b275a15e75261882a2d80c285b9.png

CDM_200.sata2speeds.500mb.0fill.LTMregpatch.png.b410f6fb777437b9900d5cbb6b11266d.png

HWINFO64.png.1c9b1b20dc9a5ea378ee98f636d3e282.png

HWINFO64.IntelSATA.thumb.png.1a61a0b67eea5ccc34141ccf1e41001f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, so next test was to actually connect the drive to a SATA6 connection on my desktop which is an ASUS P7P55D-E with dual SATA6 ports as just a sanity check. Without any driver, registry adjustments or SSD tweaks, the drive is pulling around 160MB/s.

 

I've called BestBuy and they are going to ship me another one. I'll post my results on the new drive when I receive it. Hopefully I'll be screaming at ~500MB/s soon. If not, I'll punt and try an Intel. If that fails, I'll punt and send this W520 back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the test with a p7p55d-e is not a good baseline, because it does not have native intel sata-3 ports, but uses marvell sata-3 ports (big trouble icw sandforce sata-3 ssd's).

at http://www.kitguru.net under Reviews/Components/ssd drives there's a review of the corsair force 3 120gb drive.

if you check page 4, you can compare the results (0-fill for comparision of maximum performance)

at http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/member-reviews/45420-corsair-force-3-240gb-review.html there's a review of the 240gb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am using Asus P6X58D-E and Corsair Force 3 240GB. When installing Win 7 it couldn't be formatted and i had to go to CMD to partition and format manually. Then it hang for several times. I had to install OS on a normal SATA HD. And I tested the Corsair 240gb speed. The read was 400+mb/s which is not bad, but write only 200.

I upgraded my motherboard BIOS to the latest, it does have marvell sata3 controller. Some other issues occurred.

Anyone can recommend a PCI Intel SATA3 controller that i can buy and plug onto my motherboard to solve this issue?

The latest firmware upgrade on Corsair Force3 240GB specifically said it wont work on Marvell controller. This is bit of a joke and I wasted so much precious time.

Any help will be much appreciated!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, AsusG74sx, with Corsair Force Series 3, Firmware 1.3

 

_______________________________________________

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo

Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [sATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

 

Sequential Read : 459.700 MB/s

Sequential Write : 385.790 MB/s

Random Read 512KB : 391.910 MB/s

Random Write 512KB : 407.518 MB/s

Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 26.998 MB/s [ 6591.4 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 44.352 MB/s [ 10828.1 IOPS]

Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 111.649 MB/s [ 27258.2 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 102.973 MB/s [ 25140.0 IOPS]

 

Test : 1000 MB [C: 47.3% (26.4/55.8 GB)] (x5) <All 0x00, 0Fill>

Date : 2011/08/25 14:18:43

OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

 

__________________________________________________

 

The results fluctuate a bit but it's in this vicinity with 0fill. I'm a HD noob so I've no idea if this is good or bad.

I don't believe the G74SX has Sata3 support sadly.

 

Edit:

Using the 64 bit version gave me this... The difference seems significant...

 

___________________________________________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo

Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [sATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

 

Sequential Read : 455.771 MB/s

Sequential Write : 422.870 MB/s

Random Read 512KB : 380.602 MB/s

Random Write 512KB : 387.846 MB/s

Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 27.402 MB/s [ 6690.0 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 46.065 MB/s [ 11246.3 IOPS]

Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 112.104 MB/s [ 27369.1 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 281.634 MB/s [ 68758.4 IOPS]

 

Test : 1000 MB [C: 47.5% (26.5/55.8 GB)] (x5) <All 0x00, 0Fill>

Date : 2011/08/25 15:54:11

OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

____________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...