Riekopo Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 What's the reason there isn't an M95 RGB mouse? It seems like a strange omission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoggy26 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 +1 i defiantly want one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsair Employee Corsair James Posted October 24, 2014 Corsair Employee Share Posted October 24, 2014 Our RGB line-up of peripherals are always expanding. :sunglasse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalcProgrammer1 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Our RGB line-up of peripherals are always expanding. :sunglasse If you guys can make an RGB MMO mouse I would definitely buy it. My Razer Naga (2012) is getting old and the buttons are wearing out, but I like the 12-button keypad on the side. If Corsair could bring their RGB goodness to that style of mouse (plus forward/back buttons as well) with a high DPI laser sensor I would be very happy. Razer's software sucks compared to CUE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riekopo Posted October 25, 2014 Author Share Posted October 25, 2014 Our RGB line-up of peripherals are always expanding. :sunglasse If you guys do make it you should put the old logo on it. Also, I and many others would prefer an optical sensor as opposed to a laser sensor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsair Employee Corsair James Posted October 28, 2014 Corsair Employee Share Posted October 28, 2014 If you guys do make it you should put the old logo on it. Also, I and many others would prefer an optical sensor as opposed to a laser sensor. Here's an honest question: Why optical? I hear the low DPI argument, but do you guys really notice it that much versus laser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warplane95 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 why not a dual sensor? laser and optical like my razer mamba? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riekopo Posted November 5, 2014 Author Share Posted November 5, 2014 Here's an honest question: Why optical? I hear the low DPI argument, but do you guys really notice it that much versus laser? To the trained mouse user yes you can tell the difference. Here's a subreddit that knows all about it. http://www.reddit.com/r/MouseReview Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuceoN Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Here's an honest question: Why optical? I hear the low DPI argument, but do you guys really notice it that much versus laser? As I said in my previous post: Why laser? Given all of it's inferiorities I don't get the hype... What EXACTLY makes laser mice better? Tell me :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochogan557 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 I'm just a casual gamer so Im probably not qualified to answer this but this is my opinion... I can't tell the difference. I would like to see the mmo mouse in rgb with a different button layout and a shift button on the right side of the mouse like the logitech G660. Oh and while I being so demanding one that has two right side plates for normal and bigger hands like mine. I'm loving the product line so far and Christmas is around the corner..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochogan557 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 If you guys can make an RGB MMO mouse I would definitely buy it. My Razer Naga (2012) is getting old and the buttons are wearing out, but I like the 12-button keypad on the side. If Corsair could bring their RGB goodness to that style of mouse (plus forward/back buttons as well) with a high DPI laser sensor I would be very happy. Razer's software sucks compared to CUE. Totally agree !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purplekoolaid Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Here's an honest question: Why optical? I hear the low DPI argument, but do you guys really notice it that much versus laser? Why optical? You do know that almost every laser sensor including all of corsair laser mice have inconsistent acceleration right? On top of this there have been numerous complaints with your laser mice having smoothing(input delay) with mice movements. Your optical mice on the other hand do not. The corsair M45 is the best performing optical mouse that corsair provides. Higher DPI does not mean a better mouse. If anything it usually means the dpi settings are not native which means software is used to obtain interpolated dpi points which can cause smoothing and jitter. So is there a downside to optical? The only down side is them on glass and other weird mice surfaces. Even then with the newest 3310 sensor and the 3988 sensor that is, can have an option to optimize for a mouse surface. Either way if anyone wants to have their mouse track well regardless of laser or optical they will be using a cloth or hard pad so that's not even a relevant argument. Corsair has a gaming line. So make us professional optical sensor mice that utilize flawless sensors like the 3310. Us csgo or competitive shooter players don't want these unpredictable flawed sensors that are being put into laser mice. We don't give a damn about the dpi as long as it is reasonable (3200 max is reasonable). Another thing is to make sure the sensor used for optical is one that is flawless. Not all optical are flawless but for the most part only optical is flawless TLDR: optical provides us gamers with flawless sensors unlike laser. we also don't need high dpi gimmicks because they do not improve sensor performance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black.Lotus Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I'm just a casual gamer so Im probably not qualified to answer this but this is my opinion... I can't tell the difference. I would like to see the mmo mouse in rgb with a different button layout and a shift button on the right side of the mouse like the logitech G660. Oh and while I being so demanding one that has two right side plates for normal and bigger hands like mine. I'm loving the product line so far and Christmas is around the corner..... Please a "shift button" which programmable... Bought the MMO7 mouse because I wanted a button on the right side, sadly it was only for switching modes. I want a good mouse with useful buttons, Corsair please, make it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riekopo Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 Why optical? You do know that almost every laser sensor including all of corsair laser mice have inconsistent acceleration right? On top of this there have been numerous complaints with your laser mice having smoothing(input delay) with mice movements. Your optical mice on the other hand do not. The corsair M45 is the best performing optical mouse that corsair provides. Higher DPI does not mean a better mouse. If anything it usually means the dpi settings are not native which means software is used to obtain interpolated dpi points which can cause smoothing and jitter. So is there a downside to optical? The only down side is them on glass and other weird mice surfaces. Even then with the newest 3310 sensor and the 3988 sensor that is, can have an option to optimize for a mouse surface. Either way if anyone wants to have their mouse track well regardless of laser or optical they will be using a cloth or hard pad so that's not even a relevant argument. Corsair has a gaming line. So make us professional optical sensor mice that utilize flawless sensors like the 3310. Us csgo or competitive shooter players don't want these unpredictable flawed sensors that are being put into laser mice. We don't give a damn about the dpi as long as it is reasonable (3200 max is reasonable). Another thing is to make sure the sensor used for optical is one that is flawless. Not all optical are flawless but for the most part only optical is flawless TLDR: optical provides us gamers with flawless sensors unlike laser. we also don't need high dpi gimmicks because they do not improve sensor performance This user gets it. I would add that the only time a super high DPI would be useful is if you're using a super high resolution screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzStejz Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Will we see once Corsair M95 - RGB edition? I really want buy this mouse but for a long time, there is only classic edition and I want to change LED colors on mouse, so I can combine them with my system etc. You could give us some information about it, because in my opinion a lot of people waiting for this mouse. And I certainly do not want to buy this mouse twice. Thanks and have a níce day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terabyte Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 It's been asked a few times but all we got is that they won't talk about unreleased product (if they will ever release it) so.. we can only wait for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketPuppy Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 The optical thing is mostly a myth. At a mouse 400dpi you would need a 20" 8k screen for the laser "jitter" to result in a deviation of more than 1 pixel. At 1080p and a 24" screen with 400dpi mouse tracking you have a max deviation of .24 pixels. If screen size or mouse dpi increases the deviations gets smaller. Example 24" 1440p screen with 800dpi mouse setting = 16% of a pixel max deviation from path. It is largely a marketing ploy that some communities have taken hook, line, and sinker. Even a crappy modern mouse is significantly more accurate than a human being can take full advantage of. The issues with input lag and poor tracking were mostly with some 2007-2010 laser mice and were usually a software/firmware issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.