Jump to content
Corsair Community

Problem with Corsair Link and Motherboard Temp


aboghadeer

Recommended Posts

hi to all

I got the latest version of Corsair Link v4.3.0.153

And I saw that there is a problem with the motherboard temp, as in the picture

motherboard temp

Temp#1 : 105.0 C

Temp#1 : 96.5 C

Temp#1 : 40.0 C

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_38267yip1.png

 

Please help me for this problem

 

Best Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please help me for this problem

 

I expect CL4 is reporting the Nuvoton NCT6779D sensor information when it should be reporting the Nuvoton NCT7904D information. As CL4 uses the CPUIDSDK your best option to get this fixed is to confirm that http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html has the same issue and then ask for HWM to be fixed. With luck it will then be fixed in a future CL4 release.

 

CL4 only looks to be reporting 16 of your 32 cores. This is because it's a 32-bit program and should be a 64-bit program. See http://forum.corsair.com/forums/showthread.php?p=833699

 

My SIV utility should do rather better, see http://forum.corsair.com/forums/showthread.php?p=782582.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for all information

 

Good luck getting the CPUIDSDK fixed. You have a far higher chance of that then getting a 64-bit CL4.

 

It would be good if you posted the SIV initial screen shot from your system so I can check all is as it should be. Thus far I have only done limited testing of the Xeon E5 v4 support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi MR.red-ray this is all information my system from SIV utility

 

http://b.top4top.net/p_382re6g41.png

 

http://c.top4top.net/p_382oz3l91.png

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_38280q8z1.png

 

http://b.top4top.net/p_382cry0l1.png

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_382gws7a1.png

 

http://a.top4top.net/p_382b40lp1.png

 

http://f.top4top.net/p_382q1sje1.png

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_38282uap1.png

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_382s4nl51.png

 

 

Best Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi MR.red-ray this is all information my system from SIV utility

 

Thank you for the screen shots in which SIV did almost as well as I hoped.

 

SIV did not find the NCT7904D so it must be switched to the BMC. Looking on page 2-32 of the motherboard manual if you use BMC_EN1 to disable the BMC then SIV should be able to report the NCT7904D information. Use [sMB Bus] + [PMB Bus] to check what is present on the SMBus.

 

I suspect you should do Menu->Tools->Maximum Lines->Set nn Lines to tell SIV how many lines to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so sorry

I did not find the choice as your own image No#2

I'm use SIV64X v5.14

 

Press the two [65536] buttons so there are more GDI objects and try again. After doing this the red blobs should turn green

 

You need to reboot to ensure the new values are in effect. In general this is not needed, but your system needs more GDI and USER objects than most.

 

Are you running Supermicro SuperDoctor® ? You need to close this down before running SIV as it fails to use the Access_SMBUS.HTP.Method named mutex to interlock SMBus access, see http://forum.corsair.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141037

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally :biggrin:

 

Thank you. I had initially forgotten the BMC needed to be disabled.

 

The values from the NCT7904D are incorrect, but I am none too sure why. You could get the SIV 5.15 Beta (Menu->File->Download->SIV Beta) and see if it does any better, but I suspect it will not. A [sensor Debug] screen shot might help. If your e-mailed me the two Menu->File->Save Local files then I should be able to figure out why.

 

Are you running Supermicro SuperDoctor® ? You need to close this down before running SIV as it fails to use the Access_SMBUS.HTP.Method named mutex to interlock SMBus access, see http://forum.corsair.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141037

Link to comment
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=27338&stc=1&d=1484814690

 

Checking in the save file then Bank 2 is selected when it should be Bank 0. Also looking at the [sMB Bus] panels above device [ 1_2D ] offset FF is 07 rather than 00.

 

Some other software must be changing this so I have adjusted Beta-18, please e-mail me new save files using SIV 5.15 Beta-18 or later. Include SIV_PC.dmi.

 

I guess it could be CL4 or CAM doing this. Why are you running them when you don't seem to have any NZXT or Corsair Link hardware?

 

Now the Nuvoton NCT7904D is accessible does CL4 do any better? What about CAM?

429337673_Bank2shouldbeBank0.thumb.png.6b2dc106e2a7e4b14413a615e2778ab5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have CAM program from NZXT site and i can delete it from my system

 

Thank you for running the tests and new save files. As far as I can see all the information is now as it should be.

 

Below you can see the Sensor Thread was rather overloaded @ 148%. This is down to the large number of SMBus sensors and the SMBus being rather slow. The more monitoring programs you have active the worse this will be. Given this and that CAM reports rubbish I see little merit in using it.

 

How does CL4 now do? I suspect when you start CL4 the Sensor Thread will be even more overloaded, look at Menu->Edit->View STC Info to check.

 

Why are you running CL4 + CAM when you don't seem to have any NZXT or Corsair Link hardware?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=27341&stc=1&d=1484828467

1269745343_STCInfoASUSZ10PE-D16WS.png.b098d9da4c10f07559cd894a7685c363.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks alot for all info and +1 for you

Now i'm delete CAM and CL4 from my system by IOit Uninstaller and restart my system

then i open your program SVI64X v5.15 beta 18

 

http://c.top4top.net/p_384cc4xt1.png

 

http://a.top4top.net/p_384j0dgl1.png

 

http://d.top4top.net/p_384hgsrk1.png

 

New test and New file Attachments ( SIV_PC.txt + SIV_PC.dmi )

 

Best Regards

MyNewTest_1.zip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New test and New file Attachments ( SIV_PC.txt + SIV_PC.dmi )

 

Thank you. All now looks OK.

 

SIV using 4.71% of one CPU (0.0736% of the system) seems quite high, but as SIV had only been running for two minutes most of this is the start-up time. After an hour this should be much lower, is it?

 

Is System Information Viewer -> نظام المعلومات عارض correct please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all thanks to you about all the information and assistance that gave me them

You are a gentleman and loves helping others

 

I am doing some tests on the system more than an hour to see the endurance and ability to work in an environment under pressure

And I would love to tell you that the system has passed all the tests

 

As for SIV ( System Information Viewer ) it works very excellent and there are no any problems

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_384x7ly61.png

 

http://e.top4top.net/p_384lj9qb1.png

 

Again I thank you with all my heart

Best Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

System Information Viewer In Arabic عارض معلومات النظام

 

Thank you. This will be fixed in Beta-20.

 

Would you like SIV to have more in Arabic? If so please edit the attached file. It's easy to change the words, but I am none too sure on the effect given Arabic is right to left.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=27347&stc=1&d=1484902447

886220569_SIVArabic.thumb.png.49581625b3daf29220e1b50f4add297c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...