Pallyke Posted October 12, 2008 Share Posted October 12, 2008 Hi, Bought my system last year. Now I would like to overclock it. The ASUS Striker Extreme has a nice AI Overclock feature in the bios. I did set it to OC 5%, ran orthos ... stable I did set it to OC 10% ran orthos ... stable But when i tried to auto OC 15% i got bsod during vista boot. Maybe it is best to input manual oc values. I would like to run my E6700 (2.67Ghz) at 3.2Ghz Read a couple of guides now, but am still unsure about the exact values. Could someone please post detailed BIOS settings System details can be found in my profile. If not sufficient just tell me :biggrin: Edit: Could it be that the AI Overclocking option messes up my RAM values? Grtz & Thx, Pallyke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pallyke Posted October 12, 2008 Author Share Posted October 12, 2008 EDIT: I manually entered the settings in BIOS now. Set FSB to 1228 Mhz Linked 2:3 ratio with Memory at 921 Mhz CPU speed at 3070 Mhz EDIT: Just passed 1 CPU stress test with Orthos. Memory Timings: 5-5-5-18, T2 & 1.9V Passed 1 memtest cycle. Used these settings because i got errors at test#5 in memtest with 5-5-5-12 CPU stressed with orthos both cores run at 63°C max. Wonder if this is acceptable. Probably won't make 3.2Ghz. Using Zalman CNPS9700-Cu to cool CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerekT Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 You are fully acceptable with a load of 63°C max. I would move to 3.2Ghz and retest. Enter your BIOS and set: AI Tuning : Manual Nvidia GPU Ex : Disabled LinkBoost : Disabled FSB - Memory Clock Mode : Unlinked FSB (QDR), Mhz : 1600 Actual FSB (QDR), Mhz : 1600 MEM (DDR), Mhz : 800 Actual MEM (DDR), Mhz : 800 Vcore Voltage : Auto Memory Voltage :2.1v 1.2v HT Voltage :1.3v NB Core Voltage :1.40v SB Core Voltage :1.50v CPU VTT Voltage :1.35v DDRII Controller Ref Voltage : Auto DDRII Channel A Ref Voltage : Auto DDRII Channel B Ref Voltage : Auto tCL (CAS Latency) : 5 tRCD : 5 tRP : 5 tRAS : 18 Command Per Clock (CMD) : 2 clock (2T) Advance Memory Settings tRRD : Auto tRC : Auto tWR : Auto tWTR : Auto tREF : Auto tRD : Auto tRFC : Auto Async Latency : Auto CPU Spread Spectrum : Disabled PCIE Spread Spectrum : Disabled MCP PCIE Spread Spectrum : Disabled SATA Spread Spectrum : Disabled LDT Spread Spectrum : Disabled CPU Internal Thermal Control : Enabled Limit CPUID MaxVal : Disabled Enhanced C1 (C1E) : Enabled Execute Disable Bit : Disabled Virtualization Technology : Enabled Enhanced Intel Speedstep Tech : Enabled LDT Frequency : 5x PCIEX16_1 Frequency (Mhz) : 101 PCIEX16_2 Frequency (Mhz) : 101 PCIEX16_3 Frequency (Mhz) : 101 SPP<->MCP Ref Clock, Mhz : 202 If you are using the system normally, gaming, video and audio editing, etc. and not using 24/7 folding etc, then your nominal use will not make anywhere near the full Orthos load anyway. I find 70C to be my full load on those processors. (B2 Revision). Leave the DRAM at stock whilst you test for the 3.2Ghz overclock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pallyke Posted October 15, 2008 Author Share Posted October 15, 2008 Running stable at 320 FSB so 1280 QDR, my multiplier is x10. 400FSB would give me 4Ghz ^^, Thx for the help, my memory runs at 5-5-5-12 as long as i stay at 800 Mhz ;-) Or can i set my multiplier to 8x ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerekT Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 320 X 10 is a good spot with that CPU and your thermals. That processor has a characteristic to run fairly warm. You can test with lowering the multiplier and raising the FSB but I would say that your thermals will increase quite a bit. Find your sweet spot but I think that with your mid range cooler and that CPUs propensity to run hot, I would hazard a guess that your sweet spot will have more to do with thermals than inability of the CPU to run stable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.