Thorben Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 Hello forum people, I've bought a new system using 4 Corsair CM2X1024-6400C4 modules on an ASUS P5N-E SLI motherboard. As the system kept crashing, I decided to do the memory test with Memtest86+ on the system. As the test of the 4 RAM simultaneous always crashed, I started testing them one by one. (The system volatge was put to Auto, I assume thats fine) The resuls were strange (every module was tested twice) Module 1: +- 311 errors Module 2: +- 150 errors Module 3: +- 25 errors Module 4: okay I know that the chance of buying 4 modules and having 3 "defective" modules tends till zero. Still, if there Is soomething systematically wrong with the mainboard, how could it be that module 4 is okay? Furthermore, it just looks weird that from test to test, the errors are getting less and less. What also strikes me is, that, now testing for example the module 1 a third time after I tested all the other modules, it only brings around 100 errors. There is something rotten in the state of denmark thanks Thorben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerekT Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 The memory controller can not keep up with the extra DRAM at the rated 6400 speed. You will need to drop the speed of the DRAM from 800Mhz to 667Mhz. If you had purchased 4 X 1024MB of PC8500 (1066Mhz) DRAM, then you would have had to drop to PC6400 (800MHz) DRAM, etc. 2 X 2048 will not issue this problem. This is a problem of all 4 banks being populated. Think of it this way. If you have a small phone book, then when you go into the index to find the page where you will find the phone number you are doing so at a certain speed due to the pages of the Index. Then you have to drive through the pages to get to the number. Now if your index is twice as large and the pages twice as many, then it takes longer to access the data. Now DRAM has a Strobe and the length of the strobe is how long the rows and columns can be left open before they must be refreshed. There is not enough time for the dram to be refreshed and then accessed with 4GB at the full access speed of the DRAM. The chipsets are optimized for 2GB, not 4GB and for 2 DRAM slots, not 4 DRAM slots populated. You can overclock the FSB (and hence the Memory Controller Hub = MCH) to gain some extra bandwidth and thus access the capabilities of the DRAM since the chipset is now clocked up. Usually when you clock up the FSB and concurrently the Memory Controller Hub (MCH) you need to raise the voltages of the CPU/MCH a bit as well. Try these settings and retest: Advanced: JumperFree Configuration AI Tuning = Manual Overclock Options = Disabled System Clocks NB PCI-e Frequency (MHz) = 100 Voltage Control Vcore Voltage = Auto Memory Voltage = 2.1v NB Core Voltage = 1.35 FSB & Memory Config FSB - Memory Clock Mode = Unlinked FSB - Memory Ratio = 4:5 FSB (QDR) = 266 Chipset: Memory Timing Setting tCL = 4 tRCD = 4 tRP = 4 tRAS = 12 Command Per Clock = 2 Clocks tRRD = Auto tRC = Auto tWR = Auto tWTR = Auto tREF = Auto tRD = Auto tRFC = Auto Async Latency = Auto CPU Spread Spectrum = Auto PCIE Spread Spectrum = Auto SATA Spread Spectrum = Auto LDT Spread Spectrum = Auto LDT Frequency = 4x USB Configuration USB Controllers = Enabled USB Legacy Support = Disabled (Disable when you memtest. Enable afterwards if you have usb keyboard) USB 2.0 Controller = Enabled Results? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsair Employees RAM GUY Posted November 2, 2007 Corsair Employees Share Posted November 2, 2007 It is likely that these modules would give you errors when leaving the voltage at the auto setting. Set the memory voltage to 2.1 and follow the rest of Dereks settings and let us know what happens! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorben Posted November 4, 2007 Author Share Posted November 4, 2007 Hey folks, I just changed the settings according to Dereks instructions. There are nevertheless some flaws: The voltages do no exactly fit (MemV: 2.085V vs. 2.1V, NB CoreV: 1.393V vs 1.35V), the FSB memory ratio can not be changed and the FSB (QDR) value can not be set to 266 MHz as there is a minimum level at 533 MHz. As you said, i set the MemDDR voltage to 667 MHz. What's most important: IT SEEMS TO WORK. I only had the time to test one RAM brick until now, but as it displayed no error in Memtest so far, and also putting in the other three bricks did not hurt, I suppose the test tomorrow will run fine. I hope at least. Still, only question remaining: If the RAM voltage can not be set to the exact value, which to choose? The closest value, or the closest value just below or just above standart. And what to do with my FSB QDR? thanks so much, you guys are great Thorben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerekT Posted November 4, 2007 Share Posted November 4, 2007 I just changed the settings according to Dereks instructions. There are nevertheless some flaws: The voltages do no exactly fit (MemV: 2.085V vs. 2.1V, NB CoreV: 1.393V vs 1.35V), the FSB memory ratio can not be changed and the FSB (QDR) value can not be set to 266 MHz as there is a minimum level at 533 MHz. As you said, i set the MemDDR voltage to 667 MHz.Good interpretation Thorben. Setting the FSB to 533 must be the 1066 (QDR) and for some reason they double it. LOL What's most important: IT SEEMS TO WORK. I only had the time to test one RAM brick until now, but as it displayed no error in Memtest so far, and also putting in the other three bricks did not hurt, I suppose the test tomorrow will run fine. I hope at least.Very likely. Still, only question remaining: If the RAM voltage can not be set to the exact value, which to choose? The closest value, or the closest value just below or just above standart. And what to do with my FSB QDR?.I choose the DRAM voltage that is close to the lower end, but if it fails in memtest, then I move it up one increment. It's finding what fits. :) Your FSB is correct I would say. For some reason they turn the 266 X 4 = 1066 into 533 X 2 = 1066 I would think. Download CPU-z and check this out. http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-141.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.