Performance Pro: post your as-ssd results!

here are my initial results after installing win7 pro (raid0 array/2x 128 cpp on an asus maximus IV gene-z, 128k stripe ):

 

http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/9426/86862799.png

Your pic doesn't work because you're hotlinking to a forum that doesn't allow it (and rightly so). Also, Corsair tests with ATTO and IOMeter 08 (both are listed on the spec page), not AS SSD.

My test P.Pro 128GB on Amd SB850:

 

drive empty:

http://uptiki.altervista.org/_altervista_ht/14iirzvu55ha21fmjw6_thumb.jpg

 

with OS + programs

http://uptiki.altervista.org/_altervista_ht/8bfyijhvp79dyqia60o_thumb.jpg

Your pic doesn't work because you're hotlinking to a forum that doesn't allow it (and rightly so). Also, Corsair tests with ATTO and IOMeter 08 (both are listed on the spec page), not AS SSD.

 

atto is not a real test, and i/o meter will allow compressible data unless you play with it. as-ssd gives a worst case, but these drives are awesome. i would hope you would think that was neat. you seem particularly hostile.

(edited first post)

Looking Good!

neat results, but this was a thread for the corsair performance pro drives using as-ssd ;)

Great raid0 results! I'm drooling a bit here even though i must admit my ForceGT does its job well too.

 

Curse you, greediness :)

atto is not a real test, and i/o meter will allow compressible data unless you play with it. as-ssd gives a worst case, but these drives are awesome. i would hope you would think that was neat. you seem particularly hostile.

(edited first post)

Nothing hostile about saying that the other site was right to block hotlinking.

i had no issue with the blocked image.

let's keep it on topic. if you have to communicate with me personally, you can do so via PM.

Great raid0 results! I'm drooling a bit here even though i must admit my ForceGT does its job well too.

 

Curse you, greediness :)

 

the gt is a sweet drive.

i, after running only ssds storage for the last 3+ years, made a list of what i wanted most for my next upgrade:

handles incompressible data as it would compressible/toggle 32nm nand/120gb size at price point/performance for two drive raid0, to be used on an intel pch. these are perfect.

Here are some results from my PC. I have a piss load running in the back ground 83 processes / 88 running services.

 

I am not getting anywhere near the speeds I expected from my 4k writes, I will have to take a look into them. In fact if anyone has any suggestions or any idea as to why my 4k writes are so low, please , chime in.

 

http://3dgamepit.com/images/as-ssd-bench.PNG

 

http://3dgamepit.com/images/as-ssd-file-tran.PNG

 

http://3dgamepit.com/images/as-ssd-compression.PNG

 

http://3dgamepit.com/images/as-ssd-all.PNG

There is already a benchmark thread, maybe you want to share your results here: http://forum.corsair.com/v3/showthread.php?t=98607

I didn't even see the other thread, I'll have to post some benches on that thread to 8-). I do like the idea that this thread is dedicated to Performance Pro series though.

There is already a benchmark thread, maybe you want to share your results here: http://forum.corsair.com/v3/showthread.php?t=98607

 

I prefer to see benchmark results sorted by drive, so I think M.O. is on the right track! That other thread is a cluster iwh.

 

Here is a humble 128 PPro running on Z68. Excuse the dual benchmark - I didn't edit out the atto. They need to update the attachment service here... no thumbs? Old school tech! haha http://webpages.charter.net/campb292/Compare/ppro.PNG

Looking Good!

 

how do you save the .bmk to a picture file or convert, i would like to post my benchmarks also with atto

Don't use the save as feature on ATTO, just use the Windows 7 snipping tool - really fast and even a bit faster than the old copy to clipboard. Also, post the ATTO screenshot over in that other benchmark thread, this one is for as ssd. ATTO makes things look good (for marketing), but really shows bandwidth capacity not really how fast the drive handles data. If you are interested in other benchmark options give the anvil storage utilities a try!

You don't convert a .bmk file - you hit ALT+PtrScn and then paste into mspaint or take a screenshot with another method.

 

Also, this thread is not for ATTO.

You don't convert a .bmk file - you hit ALT+PtrScn and then paste into mspaint or take a screenshot with another method.

 

Also, this thread is not for ATTO.

 

this.

thanks wired ;):

Here are some results from my PC. I have a piss load running in the back ground 83 processes / 88 running services.

 

I am not getting anywhere near the speeds I expected from my 4k writes, I will have to take a look into them. In fact if anyone has any suggestions or any idea as to why my 4k writes are so low, please , chime in.

 

 

which rst drivers are you running (try the whql '11.0.x' release)? if you haven't already done, you could turn off c states and speedstep in your bios, and use the 'performance' power options in windows

2 * Corsair Performance Pro 128GB - RAID0 (soft, Intel® Rapid 11.0.0.1032 + strip 16KB)

Was [ ASUS P5Q-E (P45 + ICH10R, SATA2) ]

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5502/32548944.0/0_72189_f69b2796_XL.jpg

Has become [ ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3, SATA3 ]

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4701/32548944.0/0_72b6f_2158f7e5_XL.jpg

Dis07, nicely done, and I see you're using the 16k strip(e) size. Would you agree you tend to loose a little bit of sequential speed with the small strip size, but gain more speed in the 4k speeds, which is likely more important performance-wise? Also, do you have Write-back cache enabled in both the SATA II and SATA III tests? I would of thought the Write results on SATA II would be better than they are, although I get similar results with an ICH10R/SATA II board with a different manufactures SATA III SSDs, so I won't post the scores.

 

Did you try the AS SSD Copy-Benchmark on your SATA III board?

Did you try the AS SSD Copy-Benchmark on your SATA III board?

2 * Corsair Performance Pro 128GB RAID0 (soft + strip 16KB) AS SSD Copy-Benchmark; SATA3

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4607/32548944.0/0_72d80_5a4fcead_XL.jpg

after playing with stripe sizes, for the intel ports, the 128k seems to give all around best results. the 4k through and up to 32k didn't do much but drop total scores, the 4k stripe maybe increasing the 4k results by a point or two.

mine doesnt look good like yours guys on seq r/w but 4k r/w is still impressive for sata2 :)

 

im thinking getting another one and make them pair in raid0 :)

http://h13.abload.de/img/mfauuiro.png

it's system drive, i updated orom bios to 11.1.0.1413 but nothing changed major performance wise slight up and downs

which rst drivers are you running (try the whql '11.0.x' release)? if you haven't already done, you could turn off c states and speedstep in your bios, and use the 'performance' power options in windows

 

This... is true. Plus it might be the RSTe driver used with X79 boards, that is not used by any other PC. Over-clocking also increases scores, and letting the PC idle for a while so nothing else is going on. Also don't have anything else running during the benchmark, not even a hardware monitor. Some people don't have an OS on their drives, which makes a big difference. Another trick is running is Windows Safe mode, so only the most basic services are running.