The Corsair User Forums  

Go Back   The Corsair User Forums > Corsair Product Discussion > Solid State Drives (SSD)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2012, 03:13 PM
ZeroOne ZeroOne is offline
Registered User
ZeroOne's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35
POST ID # = 602756
ZeroOne Reputation: 10
Default GT vs GS vs Neutron GTX at 120-180 GB size

It seems that lower than the 256GB zone, changes happen to write speeds and IOPS between certain drives that make the "best" drive unclear....

Just trying to determine which one would be the best to get and at that size, newer does not seem to equal "better."

Any thoughts? Would like to try the new LAMD controller but have the fastest possible responsiveness in windows and programs.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #2  
Old 09-15-2012, 03:45 PM
Wired's Avatar
Wired Wired is offline
Administrator
Wired's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 32,001
POST ID # = 602759
Wired Reputation: 16
Default

Depends on what you want to do. Some are better for different types of read/writes, e.g. better for video editing.
__________________
No, I don't work for Corsair
...you need to flow like a river...
Forum Rules
Admin of this forum / webdesignforums.net / Petri's IT Forum / The Corsair Memory Steam Group
Founder/Creator/Admin of ZE SECRET PROJECT (Coming Soon)
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #3  
Old 09-15-2012, 05:47 PM
ZeroOne ZeroOne is offline
Registered User
ZeroOne's PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35
POST ID # = 602776
ZeroOne Reputation: 10
Default

I'm really just looking for the fastest possible response time when loading multiple applications / browsers / game loading. Load times / windows boot is the highest priority. It's probably true that any of these drives would be fine for this I guess. Just feels a little unclear at the top, the real differences between them other than speed numbers.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #4  
Old 09-17-2012, 02:55 PM
RAM GUY's Avatar
RAM GUY RAM GUY is offline
Corsair Product Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 118,289
POST ID # = 603092
RAM GUY Reputation: 10
Default

I would suggest doing a search for the drives you want with key word like Reviews as you will likely find some comparisons.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #5  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:41 PM
Yellowbeard's Avatar
Yellowbeard Yellowbeard is offline
Corsair Tech Mktg
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta,GA, USA.
Posts: 11,508
POST ID # = 603108
Yellowbeard Reputation: 46
Send a message via AIM to Yellowbeard
Default

GT vs GS will show mixed results with each outperforming the other by a TINY margin depending on what benchmark you use, what controller you are using, etc. At the end of the day, they are so close in performance that it would be impossible to clearly say that 1 is a clear cut winner over the other. And, they are both extremely fast to the point that it is impossible to tell them apart in real world usage.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #6  
Old 09-18-2012, 12:34 AM
GeneralEclectic GeneralEclectic is offline
Registered user
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 40
POST ID # = 603160
GeneralEclectic Reputation: 10
Default

You know, there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to Windows boot times WRT/SSD speed. At some point, boot time will be dominated by initialization of drivers and peripherals, rather than the speed at which the SSD can deliver up data.

I just configured an ASUS Z77 board with a Force3 drive. Initially, I was getting the desktop in 13 seconds. However, as I added in USB drivers, the add-on SATA driver, (this was the strange one) a AFT USB3 card reader, and blah blah blah it stretched out to 21 seconds. The AFT reader accounted for an additional 5 seconds all by itself -- probably something to do with creating a list of five virtual (and empty) drives reserved for flash memory cards.

Anyway, it's to the point now where there would probably be little percentage difference in boot time between the fastest SSD in the world compared to a heavily-used Force 1 SATAII drive with 50TB of writes to it.

Moral of the story: Don't make yourself crazy. Don't waste your money chasing geese. Buy a proven reliable drive that won't require a lot of in-service screwing around because the time you waste on the bleeding edge will quickly negate a couple of seconds here or there booting or loading an application.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
  #7  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:48 PM
..AlLkNoWinG.. ..AlLkNoWinG.. is offline
..AlLkNoWinG..
..AlLkNoWinG..'s PC Specs
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 40
POST ID # = 603281
..AlLkNoWinG.. Reputation: 10
Default

I would suggest the Neutron GTX. The reason I pick it over the others is it has overall better real world testing results. Again based on what Yellowbeard stated you wont really know the difference in loading times or boot times (results are too close), but if you were to transfer files from one location on the SSD to another on the same SSD and time it, you might know the difference then (given its a large transfer 10GB or more).
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.