![]() |
|
Register | Forum Rules | Support Ticket System | Members List | Social Groups | Edit System Specs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a HUGE problem with this. Spend all day trying the solutions given here by you, Solarity, trying another other things and nothing worked for me.
I have a bunch of corsair things. K95 RGB Platinum, Glaive RGB, Void Surround, MM800 RGB Polaris, ST100 RGB, H115i AIO watercooler and Vengeance RGB RAM modules on my desktop based on a intel core i9 7900x. The iCUE proccess is consuming ~5% of my computing resources, but this is like a margin for all resources available, being different for each CPU used by you. Looking deeply, it's consuming almost 100% of one core of my i9 with 350mb+ of RAM and on my notebook with one intel core i7 7500U, it destroys the entire performance and makes the PC useless. I tried all the solutions presented here and not even one makes any less consumption of my CPU. I'll try now rolling back for the previous build or change back to CUE+Link until this ridiculous code is fixed. If anyone else has another idea, please let me know. Thank you solarity for your help by making this post with all this info. Edit 1: Thank you again for the previously build of iCUE in another thread, solarity. You rocks! \m/ I'm rolling back to iCUE 3.2.87 on my desktop PC and backing to CUE 2.24.50 on my notebook. It's impossible to use iCUE on a i7. I'm wondering what is happening with the people using i3 or even older CPUs. Worried... a lot! Hope they find this topic with a little effort. Edit 2: I found in this another thread (thanks guys!) one post with some helpful hint, minimizing the iCUE rather than closing it to system tray helps a lot. With this now it's consuming like 40% of one core and drops the overall use to 1~2% instead of 100% of one core and 5~7% of overall CPU resources. BUT this only works in the standard profile. If I switch to another profile rather than the default one, the CPU use increases again. Tried to understand what's causing this in other profiles but I can't find anything that is causing this, nothing related to lighting effects on my KB, mouse pad, mouse, headset stand or memories. I really have no idea what is different in my profiles that is triggering the CPU extreme use. Edit 3: Ok now I figured out what is going on with my profiles. Seems that the linked lighting FX and only a few others makes this weird workaround useful and ONLY AFTER moving the XML of the demo profiles to another folder or temporary removing them. And the things becomes even more bizarre. The CPU use is only reduced when at least one light is on. If I use the "visor" FX, I got spikes in the CPU use and the spike is in the moment which the lights if off, backing to drop when lights becomes on. The graph changes accordingly the speed of the "visor" FX. Instant light mess with everything although of the state/color of it, so don't use it if you want to use this workaround. I am tired of testing this things, so I removed all the 9 XML demo profiles. Edit 4: This workaround worked only until I restarted my desktop PC. So I'm giving up for this sheet of A4 paper and rolling back to 3.2.87. Edit 5: After some more and more and more and infinite more time spent on this state of art Corsair's code, I have to let you know that they changed the things in profile database, converted when updated to the new iCUE build. So, guess what?! If you want to roll back to the previous version, your profiles wouldn't be compatible with it and no tool to convert them to the previous format is provided, if you are wondering yourself... So, for precaution, always get your profiles backed up anyway even if you are reverting to the previous build in case of the new ones isn't restored to the profile library when update again, when they should be showed up again. Although they are not in the profile lib if you roll back to 3.2.87, they still are in the profile folder: %appdata%\Corsair\CUE\profiles. So when you update again to 3.3.103+ they should be back again into the lib. Last edited by KnightArch; 06-06-2018 at 04:02 AM. Reason: 1- Added a new thank to solarity. 2- Added a note about a workaround mentioned by DevBiker. 3- Added a note found/developed by myself about the workaround. 4- Added news about the workaround. 5- +Info |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just sharing my experience short and sweet,
Updated to 3.3.103 to find iCUE using 30%-40% cpu at all times. After reading this thread and trying all possible solutions (disabling demos, disabling all lighting effects, unplugging micro usb from AIO cpu block) the only thing that worked was backing up and deleting profile_h100iv2.xml that dropped iCUE's cpu usage to 3% but now of course I have no monitoring of my AIO sooooooo ![]() |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How is this a fix? A fix would be rolling back to the previous update, because at least you can use the hardware you spent money on.
Your fix is literally just disabling all the parts. Which begs the question, why do we need to use this software if we're disabling lighting? lol. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
RGB 101 Video: General overview on RGB Zotty's Corsair Guide: RGB FAQ and Sample Diagrams Disclaimer: I am not an employee of Corsair all my opinions are my own. Last edited by solarity; 06-06-2018 at 11:27 AM. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My problem is with Dark Core SE, if i delete all color settings of Dark Core SE, CPU usage back to normal.
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for putting this together guys. I've pinned this post for reference.
__________________
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thank you for this, CJ. Corsair's dev team should speed up coding and releasing a build to fix this issue. They are too slow even for a small size company. I'm a developer and I'm sure they can be faster to solve a problem that they should tested before releasing a faulty version. There is no way that a team can be slower than me coding an app alone. I am sure Corsair dev team can be more efficient and do things faster and testing it better. What happen to that history of Corsair be the best manufacturer of hardware because the other ones in the market isn't good enough for a "fair" price if this doesn't apply to software too? Maybe things has changed to worse sneaky in front of our eyes and we didn't see it. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
@Knight - I think you have a lot of devices and we have confirmed more than a few devices have the issue that causes high CPU. The thing is you will have to preform the certain "fixes" to get it to work with this version, though you might be better off by going with the previous version. I have included that in the front page.
It looks like C-attack gave some pointers on how to use profiles in older versions of iCue: http://forum.corsair.com/v3/showthread.php?t=178357 Though it doesn't look like it can revert back to regular Cue/Link I think you biggest problem is you have so many Corsair devices, it looks like you have more than one that is causing the problem. I only have 1xK70 Lux and 2xLNP. That is why things worked out so well with me. There might be something else. Though you actually can contribute a bit. As it looks like one of a few things: 1) My instructions are poorly written. 2) You might be doing something wrong. 3) You discovered some perfect storm. So in a way you have 66% you can help the community :) Though in all honesty this is better than having one piece of software for each product like my M60 and my H2100 required.
__________________
RGB 101 Video: General overview on RGB Zotty's Corsair Guide: RGB FAQ and Sample Diagrams Disclaimer: I am not an employee of Corsair all my opinions are my own. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is this software suddenly "muh early access beta alpha work in progress +more buzzwords", it was not advertised as such anywhere else outside of the forums.
I'm getting tired of Corsair treating us like ****, this previous purchase was my last. +1 person with H100i v2 with problems |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can also confirm the Dark Core is the problem for me. I use one at home and at work. My work computer had iCue CPU at 45% until I removed the Lighting effects for the mouse and it dropped to 5% (old CPU but 45 to 5 is quite noticeable). The K95 Plat was the only other iCue driven item.
On my home PC, CPU was at 14% before I removed Lighting on Dark Core SE. It drops to 1.5% with all these other devices in iCue: K95 Platinum, MM800 RGB Polaris, H150i Pro, Lightning Node Pro with 1 RGB strip in each port, and a Commander Pro controlling 4 RGB strips, 4 LL120 and 2 LL140 fans. The only lighting sequence is a solid color rain effect with Lighting Link on all devices. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes, I have many devices affected by this flaw, but it's not really entirely related to devices. Even on my notebook with absolutely no devices connected iCUE devours my CPU, so i moved on to CUE 2 because I actually only use the headset on it. But in my desktop PC I decided to downgrade to 3.2.87 and make the hard way backing up my profiles because, you know, I was a fool and didn't make one single backup in this version LOL Regarding what you said, I agree that there might be something else. The 1 is absolutely not the case, but 2 and 3 it's possible hahaha even I don't think so, but you know, I was working on it for a very long time and this might have affected me in some way that I started to mess up with the things without notice at some point. I tried to contribute to help the community as much possible as I can, but I work streaming games, making videos and developing apps, so I can't spend much time trying to solve a problem that is beyond my hands, talking about the code lines itself. I think we as a community did our part in this "job" very well and it's done, now it's Corsair time to do something definitely final. I do agree with you it's better have one software to control everything. I dream with iCUE being able to handle Asus AuraSync using its API because the native Asus app sucks and devours some CPU resources too, but... And finally, I did not get from where you found this "66%" of whatever I have hahaha I'm a dumb! LMAO |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think we should probably start listing hardware and OS version when reporting to try and pin this to specific devices or hardware. I am seeing people with the same basic chipset and core hardware as me, but with drastically different results.
Asus Z370 Maximus X Code/8700K Commander Pro HD140 x 5 Corsair LED strips x 4 H115i Pro K95 Platinum M65 Pro MM800 mouse pad Win 10 PRO 1803 (17134.81) The two Corsair services peak at about 2% each, for a total of 4%. Most of the time, it is less than three with the window up and CUE space open. Obviously, I am not affected by this. I might even be better than the prior version. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is no sense to list system setup in comments since it's listed in system specs and is "against the rules" of this forum, as said in system specs editing panel. It lacks some useful fields but is good enough to show our system specs.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The idea is not to add filler and make posts unnecessarily long, however I am having a hard time seeing anyone take issue with a legitimate purpose. Besides, I do have multiple systems and I am clarifying which system is using the iCUE 3.3 version. The people this is most likely to benefit are at Corsair. If they don't like it, they can say so. Last edited by c-attack; 06-06-2018 at 06:08 PM. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Multiple systems, good point. I have this scenario too. Forgive me to not think about this. Sorry.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|